All proposals undergo blind review. We greatly value the contribution that the blind review process makes in conference presentation selections and appreciate the time that our reviewers take from their busy schedule to assist us in our efforts to build a great program.
We wish to take this opportunity to recognize and thank our 2018 Lilly-Asheville reviewers:
Maria E. Christian, Northeastern State University
Michelle Gricus, Hood College
Daphene Koch, Purdue University
Tom Mierzwa, University of Maryland, College Park
Paulchris Okpala, California State University, San Bernardino
Chris Penna, University of Delaware
Susan M. Radius, Towson University
Gail Rice, Loma Linda University
Kimberly Van Orman, University at Albany
Jody Vogelzang, Grand Valley State University
Linda White, LeMoyne-Owen College
Sue Wick, University of Minnesota
Invitation to Review
If you are interested in the opportunity to review proposals for the Lilly Conferences, click here to contact us. This obligation entails: reading 3-4 proposals, evaluating each using a given rubric, and making the recommendation that the proposal be A) accepted as submitted, B) accepted with revisions, or C) accepted in a different format than the author requested. If you have any questions about how the process works please do not hesitate to ask.