REVIEWERS

 
All proposals undergo blind review. We greatly value the contribution that the blind review process makes in conference presentation selections and appreciate the time that our reviewers take from their busy schedule to assist us in our efforts to build a great program.

 

2018 Reviewers

 

We wish to take this opportunity to recognize and thank our 2018 Lilly-Asheville reviewers:
 

Maria E. Christian, Northeastern State University

Michelle Gricus, Hood College

Daphene Koch, Purdue University

Tom Mierzwa, University of Maryland, College Park

Paulchris Okpala, California State University, San Bernardino

Chris Penna, University of Delaware

Susan M. Radius, Towson University

Gail Rice, Loma Linda University

Kimberly Van Orman, University at Albany

Jody Vogelzang, Grand Valley State University

Linda White, LeMoyne-Owen College

Sue Wick, University of Minnesota

    

Invitation to Review

 

If you are interested in the opportunity to review proposals for the Lilly Conferences, click here to contact us. This obligation entails: reading 3-4 proposals, evaluating each using a given rubric, and making the recommendation that the proposal be A) accepted as submitted, B) accepted with revisions, or C) accepted in a different format than the author requested. If you have any questions about how the process works please do not hesitate to ask.