Presented by:
Amanda J. Chunco, Elon University
Kelsey Bitting, Elon University
Key Statement:
We surveyed multiple sections of a standard introductory level environmental science class to discover 1) faculty belief about grading and 2) student feelings of belonging.
Abstract:
Student belonging is critical for recruitment and retention and grading practices may contribute to feelings of belonging. We used Likert scale surveys to assess faculty beliefs around grading and student feelings of belonging in multiple sections of an introductory environmental science class at a mid-sized liberal arts college. We found a very wide mix of beliefs about grading between professors within a single major. Students similarly had a wide range of feelings about belonging in class, although in ways that were not correlated with professor beliefs. We will refine our study to further investigate the relationship between belonging and grading.
Keywords:
grading practices, student belonging, environmental science
Learning Outcomes:
1. Reflect on their own attitudes and beliefs about grading (whether conscious or unconscious)
2. Consider course surveys to determine how students feel about their identity and belonging in the classroom
3. Learn about un-grading pedagogies used in an introductory ENS classroom


Hear it from the author:
TRANSCRIPT:
Increasing recruitment and retention of a diverse group of professional environmental scientists will be important in tackling global environmental crises. However, we have struggled to attract more diverse students at our university. We were interested in whether faculty attitudes about student learning and how grades reflect student learning in the introductory ENS class could be a barrier to students continuing on in our major. We addressed this by surveying all faculty using two sets of validated survey questions – one on grades as gatekeeping and one on whether faculty held beliefs about fixed or growth mindset. We also surveyed students on their feelings of belonging in those classes. We then tested for correlations between faculty and students. Although we hypothesized that faculty with more fixed mindsets and higher gatekeeping scores would be correlated with lower feelings of belonging, we found no support for either hypothesis. This work is still preliminary though, and we welcome feedback, suggestions, and collaborations!
REFERENCES:
Canning, E. A., Ozier, E., Williams, H. E., AlRasheed, R., & Murphy, M. C.
(2022). Professors who signal a fixed mindset about ability
undermine women’s performance in STEM. Social Psychological and
Personality Science, 13(5), 927–937.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211030398
Muenks, K., Canning, E. A., LaCosse, J., Green, D. J., Zirkel, S., Garcia, J.
A., & Murphy, M. C. (2020). Does my professor think my ability can
change? Students’ perceptions of their STEM professors’ mindset
beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and
performance in class. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
149(11), 2119–2144. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000763 Wilson, D., Jones, D., Bocell, F., Crawford, J., Kim, M. J., Veilleux, N., Floyd-Smith,
T., Bates, R., & Plett, M. (2015). Belonging and academic engagement
among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study.
Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 750–776.